In-House Grinding vs. Outsourcing: Cost, Quality, and Risk
Executive Summary
Grinding is not just a finishing step—it is a geometry-control operation.
The decision to keep grinding in-house or outsource it affects tolerance capability, scrap risk, lead time, and total cost far more than most engineers expect.
Key takeaways:
- Grinding becomes mandatory when turning or milling can’t hold geometry reliably
- Outsourcing grinding adds hand-offs, datum changes, and schedule risk
- In-house grinding improves roundness, taper control, and repeatability
- Cost comparisons must include scrap, freight, and rework—not just piece price
Baxter perspective:
When turning, grinding, and honing are integrated under one roof, geometry stays controlled and variation stays contained.





